A Nominee with Deep Experience Who’s No Stranger to Crisis
Kevin Warsh’s resume shows no lack of experience for the role of Fed Chair. As a former Federal Reserve Governor (2006–2011), Warsh was deeply involved in managing the U.S. government’s response to the 2008 global financial crisis, during which he was often described as a key link between the Fed and financial markets. Before and after his Fed service, he built a “markets + policy” profile, working in finance, including at Morgan Stanley, serving in President George W. Bush’s administration, and later holding academic and think-tank roles at Stanford University, where he was a lecturer and Dean’s Visiting Scholar at the Graduate School of Business and a visiting fellow at the Hoover Institution.
Warsh’s background contributes to the perception that he’s comfortable with both crisis decision-making and communicating to markets. As a Fed chair nominee, his experience signals competence in stressful environments, a strong understanding of market plumbing, and an ability to navigate Washington while still speaking the language of investors. He was seriously considered for the role of Fed Chair in 2017, but President Trump chose Jerome Powell instead.
A Voice for Regime Change at the Fed
Warsh has been skeptical of the post-crisis era of heavy bond-buying and a strong advocate for shrinking the Fed’s balance sheet and narrowing what he sees as institutional overreach. Recent coverage of his nomination also highlights that he has argued for lower interest rates, aligning with President Trump’s preference for easier policy. Simultaneously, he has called for changes that could tighten financial conditions via balance-sheet runoff, creating a “pro-growth rates, tougher architecture” mix that markets will parse carefully.
The key question for the bond markets is not whether Warsh is capable, but whether his regime change rhetoric translates into predictable, rules-based policy and clear respect for Fed independence once the political pressure is real. Additionally, he has been less enthusiastic about the Fed’s dot-plot construct and its long-stated mantra of data dependency. He may choose to incorporate more forward-looking guidance.
The Fed Chair Alone Does Not Decide Policy
It is important to remember that the Fed Chair counts as only one of the 12 votes (7 Federal Reserve Governors and 5 Federal Reserve Bank presidents) at the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), the Fed’s interest rate-setting body. In the past, the Fed placed a high priority on unanimous voting, but in the modern era, there is much greater visibility into dissenting opinions and votes.
Confirmation Is Still to Come
North Carolina Republican Senator Thom Tillis has said he will oppose President Trump’s nomination of Warsh until the federal criminal probe of Powell is resolved. Earlier this month, Tillis vowed to oppose any new nominee for the Fed until the Department of Justice’s (DOJ’s) controversial investigation of Powell is completed. As a U.S. senator, Tillis is a voter in the Senate’s advice-and-consent process for a Fed chair. In practical terms, Tillis has reiterated that Warsh is qualified, but he would oppose any nominee until that DOJ inquiry is fully and transparently resolved. This is a meaningful statement as Tillis sits on the Senate Banking Committee. Unsurprisingly, media reports describe his stance as a potential chokepoint for the confirmation process.
Markets Begin to Register Their Response
Gold and silver prices fell precipitously following news of President Trump’s pick. Precious metals had risen sharply in recent months, reflecting what Jim Grant—founder of Grant’s Interest Rate Observer—has described as a “reciprocal to the world’s confidence in paper currencies managed by central banks.” The initial market reaction suggests investors are reading the Warsh nomination as U.S. dollar-positive, rather than as a signal of an easy-money or politically compromised Fed. That said, the announcement also provided a timely catalyst for profit-taking after a substantial run-up in metals prices. Whether this move proves durable or fleeting will depend on how expectations around policy and Fed independence ultimately evolve.
DISCLOSURES
This information was prepared by Fund Evaluation Group, LLC (FEG), a federally registered investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended, providing non-discretionary and discretionary investment advice to its clients on an individual basis. Registration as an investment adviser does not imply a certain level of skill or training. The oral and written communications of an adviser provide you with information about which you determine to hire or retain an adviser. Fund Evaluation Group, LLC, Form ADV Part 2A & 2B can be obtained by written request directed to: Fund Evaluation Group, LLC, 201 East Fifth Street, Suite 1600, Cincinnati, OH 45202 Attention: Compliance Department.
This information is prepared for informational purposes only. It does not address specific investment objectives, or the financial situation and the particular needs of any person who may receive this presentation. Neither the information nor any opinion expressed in this report constitutes an offer, or an invitation to make an offer, to buy or sell any securities.
The information herein was obtained from various sources. FEG does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such information provided by third parties. The information in this presentation is given as of the date indicated and believed to be reliable. FEG assumes no obligation to update this information, or to advise on further developments relating to it.